<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Church in the Postmodern Era</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thri.ca/archives/49/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thri.ca/archives/49</link>
	<description>Veritas Pulchritudo Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Allen</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrica.com/blog/archives/49#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Taken from the Articles of the Anglican Church&#039;s subtitle: &quot;for the Avoiding of Diversities of Opinions&quot;...it&#039;s the anti-postmodern!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taken from the Articles of the Anglican Church&#8217;s subtitle: &#8220;for the Avoiding of Diversities of Opinions&#8221;&#8230;it&#8217;s the anti-postmodern!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Triplett</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/49/comment-page-1#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Triplett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thrica.com/blog/archives/49#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I would say that first, the multitude of voices is only important in unison: each voice adds something, but none are complete in and of themselves.

I also add that &quot;postmodernism&quot; is not an answer...it is a fad, just like every other movement in the history of thought. It will come and go, and spur another movement into the limelight for a time. I figure I will enjoy it while its here, and also look at it objectively, because its wrong in some way.

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re thinking through this stuff though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that first, the multitude of voices is only important in unison: each voice adds something, but none are complete in and of themselves.</p>
<p>I also add that &#8220;postmodernism&#8221; is not an answer&#8230;it is a fad, just like every other movement in the history of thought. It will come and go, and spur another movement into the limelight for a time. I figure I will enjoy it while its here, and also look at it objectively, because its wrong in some way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re thinking through this stuff though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

