<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Just Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thri.ca/archives/384/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384</link>
	<description>Veritas Pulchritudo Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Triplett</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384/comment-page-1#comment-10414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Triplett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thri.ca/?p=384#comment-10414</guid>
		<description>Unless morality cannot be reduced from knowing God...if knowing God is morality and morality knowing God, then the two are one goal. A more complex picture of God...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless morality cannot be reduced from knowing God&#8230;if knowing God is morality and morality knowing God, then the two are one goal. A more complex picture of God&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thrica</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384/comment-page-1#comment-10405</link>
		<dc:creator>thrica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thri.ca/?p=384#comment-10405</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right that loving God is the effect of knowing God in that we can only love God in proportion to our knowledge of him, but cause and effect is a different question from means and ends. Knowing God (in an ultimate or progressive sense) has to be the end - the benefit; and morality - loving God, which entails the act of seeking further knowledge of God - is the means. Morality is not an end in itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that loving God is the effect of knowing God in that we can only love God in proportion to our knowledge of him, but cause and effect is a different question from means and ends. Knowing God (in an ultimate or progressive sense) has to be the end &#8211; the benefit; and morality &#8211; loving God, which entails the act of seeking further knowledge of God &#8211; is the means. Morality is not an end in itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Triplett</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384/comment-page-1#comment-10404</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Triplett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thri.ca/?p=384#comment-10404</guid>
		<description>Or, morality is a necessary consequence of proper theology and is a benefit of knowing God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, morality is a necessary consequence of proper theology and is a benefit of knowing God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thrica</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384/comment-page-1#comment-10403</link>
		<dc:creator>thrica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thri.ca/?p=384#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying they&#039;re entirely separable - for the believer, the second exists as an outgrowth of the first. They are one. However, the Bible consistently makes reference to two separate categories of blessing: Morality (or lack thereof) reaps spiritual consequences for the individual, justice (or lack thereof) reaps physical consequences for society.

Or, I should say, any individual benefits of justice are only conferred upon those for whom it is an outgrowth of a total love for God.

What do you have in mind by &quot;something bigger&quot;? How much bigger does something get than the subsumption of both action and being?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying they&#8217;re entirely separable &#8211; for the believer, the second exists as an outgrowth of the first. They are one. However, the Bible consistently makes reference to two separate categories of blessing: Morality (or lack thereof) reaps spiritual consequences for the individual, justice (or lack thereof) reaps physical consequences for society.</p>
<p>Or, I should say, any individual benefits of justice are only conferred upon those for whom it is an outgrowth of a total love for God.</p>
<p>What do you have in mind by &#8220;something bigger&#8221;? How much bigger does something get than the subsumption of both action and being?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Triplett</title>
		<link>http://thri.ca/archives/384/comment-page-1#comment-10402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Triplett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thri.ca/?p=384#comment-10402</guid>
		<description>Not that you are basing your entire argument from the one verse, but I think its a misunderstanding of the greatest commandment to reduce them into two categories. Something bigger is going on there...and the two are interrelated and cannot be separated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that you are basing your entire argument from the one verse, but I think its a misunderstanding of the greatest commandment to reduce them into two categories. Something bigger is going on there&#8230;and the two are interrelated and cannot be separated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
